Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Accessory Structure Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves Roger Eastman’s variance for larger accessory building with conditions

Lower Providence Township Zoning Hearing Board · February 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The zoning hearing board approved Roger Eastman’s request to replace a damaged 12-by-18-foot shed with a 14-by-24-foot garage set 12 feet from the side and rear lot lines, imposing conditions that the structure not exceed 16 feet to the ridge and that no utilities other than electric and internet be installed.

The Lower Providence Township Zoning Hearing Board approved a variance permitting Roger Eastman to replace a damaged 12-by-18-foot shed with a larger 14-by-24-foot garage located 12 feet from the side and rear lot lines.

Eastman told the board the existing shed was damaged and that the lot’s irregular shape, steep slope, an on-site geothermal system and a nearby spring limited alternative placements. "The basic project is I have a 12 by 18 foot shed," Eastman said, describing the damage and the site constraints that, he argued, create hardship.

After hearing testimony and reviewing applicant exhibits, the board approved a motion granting the dimensional variance subject to conditions. Tejal read the motion and the conditions on the record: the maximum ridge height shall be 16 feet; no utilities other than electric and internet may be installed; and development must conform to testimony and exhibits presented. "The motion to approve variance... subject to the following conditions: 1, the maximum height shall be 16 feet to the ridge peak. 2, no other utilities other than electric and Internet can be installed. And 3, all the development shall be consistent with testimony and exhibits presented," Tejal stated.

A nearby property owner who abuts the area, John Heizer, indicated during questioning that he had no objection to the proposal. The board’s motion carried on a voice vote and the chair congratulated the applicant.

The decision authorizes the replacement structure as described and limits future alteration consistent with the conditions imposed tonight.