Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezone topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kaysville council tables rezone for Main Street insurance office over sign and parking concerns
Summary
An applicant asked to rezone 1 West 100 South from Professional Business to Central Commercial to allow larger signage; council asked for a development agreement with limits on sign height and size and tabled the item pending more detailed sign plans.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezone topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Kaysville City Council tabled a rezone request for a Main Street property after council members raised concerns about sign height, square footage and impacts on a nearby historic district and parking patterns.
Community Development Director Melinda said applicant Justin Metcalfe applied to rezone 1 West 100 South from Professional Business (PB) to Central Commercial. Staff noted the property’s designation on the Future Land Use Map supports commercial use; planning staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval (4–0), but commissioners flagged potential impacts to adjoining residential uses and suggested the council consider a development agreement to limit any future sign impacts.
Metcalfe, who has operated an insurance business at the location for more than 20 years, said he is seeking better visibility and described possible sign sizes of about 10–15 feet tall facing north; he said he would prefer not to use an electronic message center if cost or neighborhood impact argues against it. Council members said they were open to allowing a taller sign than the existing 5‑foot monument sign but wanted specific, written limitations in a development agreement. Council member Jackson proposed tabling the rezone and directing staff to draft a development agreement that would include a maximum height and square‑footage limits; the motion was seconded and carried by voice vote.
Council asked staff to work with the applicant and a sign vendor to return with precise dimensions, suggested a possible cap (15–20 feet was discussed as a potential compromise), and recommended limiting electronic or blinking elements if the sign might affect nearby residences or the entrance to the historic district.

