Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Governance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Wrightwood board to draft stipend resolution after legal briefing; no pay adopted tonight

Wrightwood Community Services District Board · January 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a legal overview of Government Code limits and Water Code options, the board asked staff and counsel to draft a stipend resolution (with opt‑out language) and delayed any adoption until financials are clarified.

The Wrightwood Community Services District board discussed whether to adopt a stipend policy for directors but took no final vote, instead directing legal counsel and staff to draft a resolution for future consideration.

Legal counsel Steve reviewed the statutory framework: under Government Code section 61047 the board may provide up to $100 per day of service, not to exceed six days in a month, and other Water Code provisions allow limited annual adjustments or changes to the number of compensable days. Counsel said a resolution or ordinance is required to authorize stipends and noted some steps—including a public hearing and a 60‑day effective delay for ordinance changes—would be necessary if the board sought to go beyond the basic CSD Act provisions.

Members expressed mixed views. One board member argued a stipend could improve accountability and recruiting for future elections; another said the district’s current budget and audit position are unclear and recommended waiting to implement any stipend until the financials are clarified. A public email from a resident cautioned that the district’s revenue base differs from larger districts that elect to compensate members.

The board’s direction: counsel (Steve) and GM Ramona will draft a resolution with opt‑out language, checks and balances and an implementation plan for board review; approval was explicitly postponed pending better clarity on district finances.

Next steps: staff and counsel will prepare draft resolution language and return it to the board for discussion before any vote.