Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Airport Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board OKs $1M airport layout plan work authorization and renews commercial agreements
Summary
The Beaufort County airport board approved a work authorization for an Airport Layout Plan estimated near $1 million and renewed several tenant and rental agreements, including a commercial operating agreement at Beaufort Executive and a UPS parking lease.
Get email alerts on the Airport Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Beaufort County airport board voted to authorize work on a new Airport Layout Plan (ALP) for the Hilton Head facility and approved several commercial agreements for airport tenants.
John, the airport director, described the ALP as "your guiding document for the future of the airport," saying it examines forecasts, facilities, environmental considerations and public engagement. When asked about the financial scope, John said the work authorization is "close to 1000000 dollars." He explained the ALP is often a condition for future federal grant funding and includes public sessions and alternatives analyses.
The board approved a work authorization for Talbert, Freight & Ellington to prepare the ALP, voting in favor by voice. The motion carried; the meeting transcript records the vote as 'aye' responses but does not list individual tallies.
Members also approved a commercial operating agreement for a Beaufort Executive tenant who occasionally rents his aircraft, which John said requires a commercial operating agreement to allow such transactions legally at the airport. Separately, the board renewed a rental agreement between Beaufort County and UPS for overflow parking along Hunter Road; John said the arrangement brings a "little bit of revenue." Both items passed by voice vote.
Board members were reminded the hangar project will be discussed at next Monday's Public Facilities and Safety committee; if the committee supports it, staff would detail rates and terms and the proposal would proceed to the finance committee and county council, likely as an ordinance requiring three readings.
