Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Police chief urges caution on House Bill 133, warns municipalities may lose Violent Crime Fund revenue

New Castle City Council · February 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

New Castle Police Chief Richard McCabe told council that House Bill 133’s presumptive-waiver language could substantially reduce the Violent Crime Fund revenue that helps municipalities pay for officers, body cameras and major-event staffing.

Police Chief Richard McCabe briefed the council on department operations and focused on House Bill 133, which he described as a bill that would create presumptive qualifications for waivers of a $15 assessment that currently funds a Violent Crime Fund used in part for municipal policing support. McCabe said the Violent Crime Fund paid for New Castle’s body-worn camera startup, some equipment replacement and overtime for large events, and that municipalities received a share of the fund based on sworn officer counts.

"To put things in perspective…since 2018, the violent crime fund has given us over $330,000," McCabe said, listing specific uses including body-worn camera startup, taser replacement and a records-management system. He told council advocates estimate the bill could reduce statewide fee collections and that municipalities could see a meaningful share of funding disappear unless state appropriations replace it.

Council members and staff discussed the fiscal-note uncertainty and possible state mitigation; McCabe noted the governor had proposed $6 million in his budget recommendation to offset potential losses but said that was a recommendation rather than a guaranteed line item. Chief McCabe encouraged local officials to engage legislators about the bill’s municipal impacts.

No vote was taken; the briefing was informational and council members asked staff to share supporting documentation so they can contact state representatives.