Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Watershed Grant topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Selectboard hears SRF watershed grant presentation and discusses principal forgiveness, cost shares and prioritization
Summary
Barnstead Selectboard heard a detailed presentation on a State Revolving Fund watershed pre-application, including consultant options, a master list of firms, the SRF prioritization process, and funding details (presenters discussed $100,000 principal forgiveness and a typical 60/40 construction cost-sharing split).
The Barnstead Selectboard received a presentation and public Q&A about a State Revolving Fund (SRF) watershed pre-application and the town's options for developing a watershed-based plan.
Presenters described a master consultant list and said only a subset of firms specialize in watershed planning; they recommended a request-for-qualifications approach and said the SRF pre-application raises a project’s priority for future construction funding. Board members and residents pressed on who would pay for work on private property; presenters said the watershed-based plan identifies problem areas and priorities but that remediation of private property generally remains the property owner's responsibility and would be enforced through existing regulations, not through the plan itself.
Funding details discussed included that engineering and plan development can be covered through the SRF model and that construction grants often cover about 60% of construction costs, with the town or local associations responsible for the remaining 40% (including in-kind contributions such as labor or equipment). Presenters discussed principal-forgiveness options and referenced a $100,000 principal-forgiveness figure; one presenter said, "No town has ever been denied a $100,000 loan forgiveness," reflecting their experience but the statement was not cross-verified in the meeting record.
The board reviewed local partners and committee members who would work on the plan, including names mentioned by presenters (for example, representatives from the University of New Hampshire and an environmental officer retired from Manchester City Airport). Presenters said they would continue to refine draft grant language with the town attorney, finalize escrow language and return with materials prepared for review and bidding.
