Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board discussion intensifies after member raises concerns about reading of The Glass Castle
Summary
A board member urged more oversight of adopted classroom texts after recounting explicit excerpts from The Glass Castle and urging a stakeholder review; staff outlined the state/district adoption process and noted parents can request alternative assignments under the district’s controversial-issues policy.
A board member criticized the inclusion of The Glass Castle in local classroom materials, saying the book’s explicit passages had distressed their child and arguing for stronger oversight of adopted texts. “My jaw hit the ground as the guy was reading this book,” the board member said during public discussion, describing passages they called sexually and verbally explicit.
District staff described the textbook-adoption process in state and local terms and said many classroom uses involve excerpts rather than full-text readings. A staff member involved in curriculum adoption said the state maintains a repository and convenes committees that include teachers and parent volunteers to vet materials and align them to standards. “The repository is the list of grades … you can log in to the different curriculums and kind of mostly see what our teachers see when they teach it,” the staff member said.
The board member urged parents to request alternative assignments when they object and proposed creating a stakeholder review committee to evaluate texts before local adoption. Staff reiterated existing procedures for parental recourse and noted the district’s policy on controversial issues: “4.801 controversial issues does allow parents the opportunity,” a director said, describing the opt-out and review pathway.
Board members and staff described the timeline for adoptions: the state process begins roughly a year in advance and districts receive materials in December–January before local decisions several months later. Staff also said they would make sample materials available and that teachers typically review or preview material before classroom use.
The meeting did not result in a vote on curriculum adoption or a formal removal of any titles. Board members asked staff to consider stakeholder involvement and encouraged parents to follow the district’s opt-out and review procedures. The item was referred for further review and the board requested that staff provide options for a stakeholder review process at a future meeting.
