Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves removal and updating of long‑outdated special‑education policies for compliance with current regulations
Summary
District staff told the board that multiple special‑education policies last reviewed decades ago were out of date; the board moved to remove redundant policies and adopt Area 1‑recommended language and required policies (including impartial hearing procedures and pre‑referral intervention strategies) for first readings or future adoption.
District staff told the Whitney Point Central School District Board that a suite of special‑education policies had not been updated in many years — some last reviewed in 1991, 2009 or 2010 — and recommended aligning the district documents with current Area 1 guidance and state regulations.
The presenter identified policy numbers under review and recommended actions: update required policies for impartial hearing procedures (policy 7670/related items) and pre-referral intervention strategies (policy 7673), consolidate duplicates (7629/7641), and remove or retire outdated policies such as 7613, 7615 (discipline of students with disabilities), 7617 (declassification), 7620 (students with disabilities participating in district programs), and others where regulatory language now supersedes older board policy.
Board members moved and seconded motions to remove or update the listed policies and to schedule required items for first or second reading as appropriate; those voice votes were carried. For example, the presenter explained that the district must have an up‑to‑date policy describing impartial hearing requirements and that some policies are now governed by regulation rather than local board policy. The presenter said the new pre‑referral policy (previously called response to intervention) will be retitled to reflect current practice and regulatory terminology.
The board also reviewed policy 7628 (provision of interpreter services for hearing‑impaired parents) and noted it is required; that policy was approved for first reading. Members emphasized that when Area 1 language differs from local preference the district will edit wording before final adoption and requested members review the draft language before the next meeting.
Next steps: board members were asked to read the packet edits and bring suggested language changes to the next meeting so staff can prepare final language for first or second reading and adoption.
