Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Civic Resolutions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

After heated debate, North Adams council adopts resolution condemning monarchy and defending the Constitution

North Adams City Council · May 27, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Following public remarks and a divided council debate over whether the chamber should weigh in on national politics, the North Adams City Council adopted a resolution condemning monarchy and policies described as undermining the Constitution by a 5–3 roll-call vote.

The North Adams City Council on May 27 adopted a symbolic resolution declaring the council condemns "the concept of American monarchy" and statements or policies the sponsors said undermine the Constitution.

The resolution, brought forward by Coun. Shade (Council Paper 12,499) and introduced in part by community speakers, prompted extended public comment and a split council debate over whether the chamber should pass a statement addressing national problems. Peter Glazer, who introduced remarks on behalf of Dr. Peter May and Ashley Shay, emphasized the resolution's symbolic value: "Passing it is the least you can do to honor them and those who gave their lives defending our freedom," he said, invoking the pledge of allegiance and the need to reassure constituents.

Supporters on the council framed the measure as nonpartisan and protective of democratic norms. "Extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures," Coun. Blackmer said, urging passage as a civic statement.

Opponents argued the council chamber should not be used to air national partisan disputes and warned the resolution could deepen local divisions. Coun. Bona said the council is a nonpartisan body and that some residents who voted differently would feel excluded if the body appeared to take a national political stance.

After debate, the council took a roll-call vote that the record shows as five in favor and three opposed; the president declared the resolution adopted. The council did not attach an enforcement mechanism to the resolution: it is a symbolic statement rather than an ordinance or policy change.

The council proceeded to routine business after the vote; several residents and councilors said they viewed the measure as an important civic reaffirmation following recent national events.

Next steps: The resolution is a formal expression of the council's stance and requires no regulatory follow-up. The council noted speakers and members may continue to address related concerns through other committees or public events.