Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Scots Valley introduces parking restrictions ordinance and approves business‑license exemptions for temporary events
Summary
Council introduced an ordinance to designate no‑stopping/no‑parking zones and voted to introduce an amendment providing a limited business‑license exemption for qualifying temporary economic‑development events; the council also discussed an enhanced infrastructure financing district (EIFD) and local business relocation concerns.
Get email alerts on the Local Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Scots Valley City Council introduced an ordinance to amend Title 10, Chapter 10.08 of the municipal code to designate no‑stopping and no‑parking areas (loading zones, bus stops and medians), grant the public works director authority to set signage consistent with traffic engineering standards, and permit the council to designate zones by resolution.
Staff described the proposed ordinance (identified as Ordinance No. 202 in the staff motion) and asked the council to introduce it and waive further readings. A council member moved to introduce the ordinance (add section 10.08.035) and waive the reading; the motion was seconded and carried unanimously.
Separately, staff presented an amendment to the business license tax ordinance to reinstate a limited exemption for vendors that participate only in designated city‑sponsored or authorized special events (events limited to two consecutive days). The proposal establishes exemption criteria, makes the city manager the approving authority for qualifying events, and ties implementation to adoption of the related user fee. Staff proposed an administrative fee model ($25 per vendor if the event organizer administers the program; $50 per vendor if the city administers it). Council members asked whether the change would apply to this year’s art, wine and beer festival; staff clarified the exemption would apply to future events because current applications are already processed.
During committee reports, council also discussed an enhanced infrastructure financing district (EIFD) study that the county agreed to partner on after a unanimous vote of supervisors. Council members noted local businesses at 75 Mount Herman Road face displacement because of a housing project and asked how the city can assist with relocation and frontage improvements through a proposed business‑incentive program.
Council introduced Ordinance 15.114 (business license amendment) for first reading, designated the city manager as the approving authority for qualifying events, and approved making implementation contingent on the related user fee; motions carried unanimously.
Council directed staff to return with the fee schedule and implementation details as part of the master user fee update expected next month.

