Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Appropriations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Conference committee tentatively reallocates appropriations to technical assistance, victim services and food programs
Summary
A legislative conference committee reviewed a grayout sheet and tentatively agreed to align with the Senate on an administrative-services position and to reassign base and one-time funds to items including Vermont Law School aid, SBDC support, a mediator and ethics position, victim-services grants administration, rural technical assistance and a food program construct.
A legislative conference committee met to reconcile appropriations differences and tentatively agreed to accept the Senate's position on not funding a proposed administrative services post while reallocating available base and one-time funds to a set of programs and positions.
Staff member said the group was revising sources and uses after several bills changed status: S218 (the chloride bill) was vetoed and S206 ‘‘is not moving,’’ which freed some base funding, and line items from S190 were removed. "In case you need yet my team, I wanted to walk you through what we're thinking of for money coming and going," the staff member said, outlining the committee's spreadsheet approach to match available dollars to priorities.
The committee discussed one-time aid for higher education and small-business support. The transcript records agreement to provide one-time funding for the Vermont Law School (described as 100,000 in the discussion) and for the Small Business Development Center (the transcript references an increment noted as "150" to fully meet a federal match; the unit is not specified in the record).
Members also identified program and personnel uses for the available funds: a mediator position, an ethics position, a flood-safety position discussed earlier, and $100,000 for grants administration directed to the Center for Crime Victim Services. The group described a developing food initiative (referred to in discussion as a Feeding Vermonters construct) and proposed restoring $250,000 for Vermont Council on Rural Development technical-assistance for rural economic development.
The committee favored funding a community program called Granny's Closet over an alternative event described as the Lake Champlain Derby. Other items noted included a legal aid hotline (described in the transcript as slightly under 60,000) and support for meals-on-wheels (a figure of 125 is referenced in the transcript and the page rounds it to about 130). The staff presentation indicated available totals of roughly $420,000 in base and $690,000 in one-time funds, leaving an estimated shortfall of about $40,000 against proposed uses.
Committee members said they had already agreed to the initial set of four priority items and asked to see the finalized food construct before completing other allocations. The public-employee benefit study in S190 was discussed as remaining an open question; presenters noted the treasurer had requested more than the $50,000 currently listed.
The committee scheduled further meetings (a possible 1:15 or 1:30 p.m. follow-up and, if needed, an additional caucus) to resolve remaining items, and members flagged that transportation-related items from AOT and a third attachment had been pulled into the package and required clarification before final agreement.
Next steps: the committee will review the food-construct details and reconvene to finalize allocations and language for inclusion in the reconciled appropriations package.
