Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Telecom Right Of Way topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council hears first presentation on Forge Fiber master use permit; company plans to operate acquired Lumen assets

City of Lake Forest Park City Council · May 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Forge Fiber representatives told the council they plan to operate aerial and underground fiber assets acquired from Lumen and may expand service; the council discussed permitting, right-of-way coordination and potential neighborhood impacts; no vote was taken.

At first presentation on May 28, the council was briefed on a proposed Master Use Permit (MUP) and franchise agreement to authorize Forge Fiber to operate fiber infrastructure in city rights-of-way. Mr. McClain introduced the item as a standard MUP for a telecommunications utility; Carly Nations, representing Forge Fiber, said the company (a subsidiary of AT&T according to her remarks) purchased substantial fiber assets from Lumen and seeks to operate existing aerial and underground lines and, in the future, expand service to more customers.

Nations said the red lines on her map indicate aerial fiber and green lines indicate underground facilities that typically connect to customers. She told council members that routine maintenance on existing assets should cause minimal disruption, while future expansions will require permits, traffic control and public notice consistent with the city code. "For the existing facilities, typically any sort of operational work would be... maintenance work," Nations said, adding that the city’s code requires right‑of‑way permits for work and notifications to residents when applicable.

Councilmembers asked about past coordination problems when multiple projects occurred in the same corridors, the handling of above‑ground facilities, and whether residents on private roads could get service—Nations said the MUP covers city right‑of‑way only. City Attorney Trudy Pratt confirmed that right‑of‑way permits are required for work and that permit terms had been violated in prior incidents with a subcontractor, noting that the MUP itself does not automatically prevent future permit violations but does establish the permitting framework.

Council did not take action; staff will bring the MUP back for further review and a future council decision.