Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
HCDA board discusses Ward Village dog‑policy complaints and possible park alternatives; staff to review master plan consistency
Summary
During the executive director's report, HCDA board members raised complaints about Ward Village's change to a no‑dogs policy and reports of aggressive private‑security enforcement; members discussed alternatives such as a nearby off‑leash or leash‑friendly park and asked staff to investigate policy consistency with the project's master plan.
Board members used the executive director report to raise concerns about Ward Village and Mahana park dog policies and reported enforcement issues by private security.
Member Sakakota and others said they have received constituent complaints that Ward Village parks previously allowed dogs but now enforce a no‑dogs policy; concerns included reports that private security's enforcement has been aggressive and may have included trespassing. "There have been reports of aggressive enforcement that's gone as far as alleged trespassing," a board member said; staff said they would investigate those reports.
Members discussed possible mitigations such as expanding a planned pocket park into an 8,000–9,000 square‑foot area usable for dog access or an off‑leash dog park maintained by the Ward Village Owners Association. Several board members noted that creating or maintaining such parks would increase maintenance costs that ultimately fall to the Ward Village Owners Association and property owners.
Executive Director Nakamoto said staff would have Ryan Tam investigate whether Ward Village's current pet policy is consistent with the project's master plan and that HCDA should generally avoid intervening in owner‑association disputes or law enforcement matters unless there is a clear master‑plan or regulatory inconsistency. No formal action was taken on this item during the meeting.
