Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Governance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Kelly Sadiki elected chair as committee approves routine minutes and appointments

Webster School Committee · May 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its May 12 meeting the Webster School Committee reorganized its officers (Kelly Sadiki elected chair) and approved a slate of routine appointments, surplus declarations and year-end procedural authorizations by roll-call votes.

The Webster School Committee reorganized leadership at the start of its May 12 meeting. A member nominated Kelly Sadiki for committee chair; the motion was seconded and approved by roll-call.

The committee also nominated and approved the vice chair (member Adam/Adamopoulos as recorded in the roll calls) and other officer roles including the secretary and payroll/warrant designees and backups. Roll-call votes for each nomination were recorded by the clerk.

Committee members approved minutes from prior meetings (April 14 regular minutes, March 23 tri-board minutes, March 31 budget workshop minutes) by motion and roll-call. Later in the meeting the committee unanimously authorized declaration of miscellaneous books and inventory as surplus and empowered the superintendent or business manager to dispose of them consistent with Massachusetts General Law Chapter 30B.

The committee also authorized the business manager to perform necessary year-end transfers to close fiscal-year accounts and received the superintendent’s goals and evidence packet for the superintendent evaluation process. The meeting concluded after a final motion to adjourn passed by roll-call.

The actions recorded in the transcript were procedural and approved without extended debate. The clerk called multiple roll calls and members responded ‘yes’ on the record for the motions presented; no recorded substantive opposition to these routine items appeared in the transcript.