Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Community Redevelopment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

CRA approves two incentive grants and opens a broad five‑year goals discussion (rails‑to‑trails, infrastructure, expansion)

City Commission and Community Redevelopment Agency of High Springs · May 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The High Springs CRA approved a $20,000 shuttle incentive for Honeybee Venture LLC and a $7,500 grant for Spring Building LLC, and spent an extended session debating five‑year priorities including infrastructure, district expansion and rails‑to‑trails tie‑ins.

At its May 28 meeting the Community Redevelopment Agency approved two project incentive grant agreements and discussed a multi‑topic planning agenda for the next five years.

The board approved a $20,000 agreement to support Honeybee Ventures’ shuttle service. Staff said the funds will subsidize a six‑month pilot and require insurance from the transportation subcontractor; Get Up and Go Transport’s Bill Kaitton confirmed scheduling adjustments to preserve summer service. The board also approved a $7,500 project incentive for Spring Building LLC that will operate as a façade‑style reimbursement (work performed, receipts submitted, end‑of‑project payout).

Board members used the five‑year goals item to solicit priorities from downtown revitalization and infrastructure to business attraction and training. Commissioners and staff highlighted several recurring themes: addressing aging water and sewer lines in parts of the CRA district, exploring whether CRA funds can support rails‑to‑trails improvements (wayfinding, sidewalks and parking) while remaining legally tied to district benefits, expanding the CRA district strategically, and leveraging grants to seed catalytic private investment.

Staff and the board repeatedly cautioned that CRA funds are legally limited and typically cannot replace projects already in the city’s CIP; attorney guidance noted the city retains discretion to approve or defer applications on a case‑by‑case basis. Staff also noted audit and administrative backlogs and the CRA’s eventual sunset/extension timeline, saying those constraints counsel careful prioritization and training for board members on allowable uses.

The CRA approved both grant agreements by voice vote and asked staff to return with training and policy options to pursue district expansion, targeted infrastructure projects and clearer grant guidance for prospective applicants.