Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tourism Events Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Prescott adopts special-event sponsorship policy to formalize funding for major tourism events, shortens contract term to three years
Summary
Council adopted a new special-event sponsorship policy to return up to 50% of city taxes (maximum $80,000) to qualifying signature events after verifying economic impact; council amended the proposal to three-year contracts with two one-year extensions and approved it 6-1 amid debate over transparency and subsidies.
The Prescott City Council on May 26 approved a new Special Event Sponsorship Policy establishing objective criteria and a funding formula for large tourism events, with the council amending the proposed five-year contract term to three years with two one-year extensions before voting 6-1 in favor.
Deputy City Manager Mike Morris described the policy as a tool to create consistent parameters for event funding and to "cultivate signature events" that help the city's brand. Under the policy, a signature event must be organized by a non-city entity, generate at least $100,000 in city tax revenue, draw at least 5,000 attendees from at least 90 miles away, and show a marketing reach of at least 1 million impressions.
Staff proposed a funding formula that would return 50% of documented city tax revenue to qualifying events, capped at $80,000. The city and the organizer would split the cost of an economic-impact study (estimated at roughly $22,000 per event), and contracts would require annual post-event reporting. Morris told the council Christmas City's recently completed study estimated $4.8 million in economic impact and $166,000 in city taxes generated, which would qualify that event for the $80,000 maximum.
Council members pressed staff for stronger accountability measures before approving the policy. Concerns included the timing of economic studies, whether contract templates would allow audits of how city funds are used, the effect on smaller TAC grants funded by bed tax revenue, and whether multi-year guarantees could expose the bed-tax fund in a downturn. "We haven't seen an economic impact study for Whiskey Off-Road yet," Councilmember Lois said, urging caution. Morris said studies were completed or in process for the prioritized events and that contracts and reporting requirements would be brought to council for approval before payments were made.
Public commenter Howard Mechanic urged the council to consider constitutional limits and said subsidizing private event operators merited careful review; he urged studies to account for replacement effects (how much activity is truly added rather than shifted from other dates).
After discussion, a council member moved to amend contract length to three years with two one-year extensions; the council adopted the policy as amended by a 6-1 vote. Staff said individual contracts and economic-impact analyses will be completed and returned to council for contract approval and post-event reporting requirements.
