Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Vacant Storefront Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wakefield members debate vacant-storefront bylaw, tax incentives and targeted property outreach
Summary
Members revisited a vacant-storefront bylaw that Town Meeting rejected in 2019, weighing enforcement challenges and alternatives including state-style tax credits, targeted outreach to key properties, redevelopment grants for upper floors, and environmental constraints on certain sites.
The group returned to a long-running discussion about how to address downtown vacant and underused properties, revisiting a vacant-storefront bylaw that was rejected at Town Meeting in 2019 and exploring alternatives including tax-credit incentives and targeted interventions.
Aaron summarized pros and cons of different approaches and described the Massachusetts-style vacant storefront incentives that rely on state tax credits to encourage businesses to occupy vacant ground-floor retail. "The program I talked about last time the Massachusetts vacant storefront program where you apply for tax credits...there's that incentive where the businesses would be able to qualify," Aaron said, noting the town could map commercial corridors to identify candidate storefronts.
Members cautioned about enforcement costs and unintended consequences. One participant noted that penalties with weak enforcement or small fines can be ineffective or prompt landlords to fill space with low-quality tenants. Several members favored a targeted approach: staff outreach and one-on-one conversations with owners of specific problem properties (cited examples included a building near Jiffy Lube with environmental contamination, the Bank of America downtown building largely dark except for an ATM, and the Lincoln building, a historic, multi-story property).
On targeted tools, staff described an existing 'underutilized properties' program that offers funds or support to developers to bring upper stories to code for residential use, and said the town can provide letters of support for applicants. Members asked staff to pursue targeted meetings with specific owners as a next step and to consider whether incentives (tax credits, redevelopment grants) or regulatory tools would be most likely to move high-impact properties toward occupancy.
No formal policy was adopted; members agreed to review the prior bylaw text and discuss revisions at the next meeting and to begin targeted outreach to key property owners.
