Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Budget committee backs biennial budget recommendation with direction to address PERS unfunded liability

Pleasant Hill City Budget Committee · May 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Pleasant Hill’s budget committee recommended that the City Council adopt a proposed biennial budget for 2026–27 and 2027–28 while asking staff and council to outline specific steps to address a growing PERS unfunded liability that is driving projected deficits.

The Pleasant Hill Budget Committee recommended the City Council adopt the proposed biennial budget for fiscal years 2026–27 and 2027–28, but appended a requirement that staff and council outline near-term steps to address the city’s rising PERS unfunded liability.

Eric (finance staff) presented the proposed budget, saying the city expects roughly $32 million in revenue and $30.7 million in expenditures for 2026–27 (not including an anticipated PERS unfunded-liability payment). "We think we'll have a deficit of about $1.9 million," Eric said while reviewing 2025–26 results, and he warned that required PERS payments could materially reduce reserves in future years.

Committee members pressed staff for more granular fund-balance information across the city's roughly 28 funds and asked whether staff maintain a playbook of potential reductions or revenue options if revenue assumptions do not materialize. Members agreed the city faces a structural revenue challenge and emphasized the need to present options and a timetable to the public for addressing the unfunded liability.

After discussion, the committee approved a motion recommending Council adoption of the proposed budget with an addendum directing staff to return with an outline of steps to address the unfunded liability. One committee member recorded opposition on the roll call; the transcript does not record an individual vote tally by name.

The committee emphasized that adopting the budget is administrative and that the council may amend figures later; staff reiterated the city must adopt a budget by June 30 and will pursue a long-term financial forecast and additional revenue/cost options after adoption.

The recommendation will proceed to the City Council for final action.