Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Harbor Bay topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
East Lansing planning panel backs 12‑story Harbor Bay mixed‑use project with conditions
Summary
The Planning Commission voted 7‑2 on May 27 to recommend city council approve Harbor Bay Ventures’ 12‑story mixed‑use project on East Grand River Avenue, contingent on a list of engineering, parking and construction conditions and pre‑certification requirements for mass timber and LEED Gold incentives. Neighbors raised concerns about alley access, setbacks and construction impacts.
The East Lansing Planning Commission on May 27 recommended approval of a 12‑story mixed‑use development proposed by Harbor Bay Ventures at 401–427 East Grand River Avenue, despite objections from a neighboring property owner. The commission’s recommendation, which will go to city council on June 16, was approved on a 7‑2 roll‑call vote.
The project would deliver about 147 residential units above ground‑floor retail and restaurants. The developer seeks incentives to add two bonus stories by using mass‑timber construction and meeting LEED Gold pre‑certification and final certification. Staff said the application meets the city’s downtown zoning framework but listed roughly 30 conditions that must be satisfied before permits or occupancy are issued, including engineering sign‑offs, storm‑water calculations, lighting controls, alley dimensions and loading access.
Why it matters: The proposal would add housing in the city center and use mass‑timber construction and LEED incentives that the city’s code ties to additional height. Supporters said the project helps meet downtown housing demand without on‑site parking; opponents warned that practical details — especially alley operations, construction staging and impacts to the adjacent State News property — had not been resolved.
The commission and staff both emphasized that several items must be resolved before a building permit or occupancy is granted. Conditions include that the applicant provide LEED Gold pre‑certification before council votes to permit the incentive stories and full certification before occupancy of those additional floors; verify mass‑timber details with the building and fire officials; and show that on‑site runoff will not increase from pre‑development conditions. The staff motion lists specific items (pavement restoration, a detailed project schedule, a public‑right‑of‑way permit, lighting fixtures and photometric plans, limits of demolition that do not damage the adjacent building, and alignment of the proposed loading dock and trash area, among others).
Neighbors pressed for additional protections. Nolan Moody, attorney for The State News (an adjacent property owner), asked the commission to delay action until the paper and Harbor Bay had met and executed an agreement on setbacks, higher‑level setbacks for future windows, alley access for large delivery trucks and construction protections including vibration monitoring and pre‑construction surveys. Moody said unresolved questions about how higher levels would interact with future redevelopment on the adjacent parcel remain.
Harbor Bay representatives said they had voluntarily provided a 5‑foot setback on floors 2–12 along the east facade to preserve drainage, maintenance and construction access on their side of the property line and that the building is designed to meet fire‑rating and sprinkler requirements where it abuts a neighboring lot. Architect Nathan Castile said details such as lighting fixtures and photometric plans are preliminary and will be refined in the construction documents to meet dark‑sky and site‑boundary lighting limits. Project representatives told the commission they would coordinate move‑in staging, loading and construction scheduling with the parking department and adjacent businesses.
On parking, staff noted the downtown public parking system offers available spaces within a short walk of the site; the applicant has discussed a city parking agreement for monthly spaces but that agreement has not been finalized. The commission’s conditions require coordination with the city parking office and any off‑site leasing arrangement to be carried forward with city review.
The commission’s approval is a recommendation to city council; several technical items remain unresolved and will be addressed during the council review and by city departments before permits are issued. The motion adopted by the commission includes 30 explicit conditions the developer must satisfy before permit issuance or occupancy for the incentive floors.
