Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Solid Waste Contract topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Morgan County approves one-year hauling contract after debate over multi‑year terms

Morgan County Fiscal Court · May 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a multi-hour discussion about rates, load weights and contract length, Morgan County Fiscal Court voted to enter a one‑year hauling contract with Rumpky for transfer‑station service; commissioners flagged tradeoffs between shorter terms and long‑term price certainty.

Morgan County Fiscal Court voted to enter a one‑year contract with Rumpky to continue hauling county transfer‑station loads after an extended conversation about rates, average load weights and contract length. The motion to approve a one‑year agreement passed on a voice vote; one member recorded opposition during roll call, but the motion carried.

Francis Rumpky, who introduced the company’s proposal to the court, said the firm had proposed various multi‑year options but could accept shorter terms if the county preferred. “We proposed a new 5‑year contract,” Rumpky said, and outlined proposed rate changes in his presentation, noting an increase to the per‑haul and per‑ton charges and that training and operational changes could help increase average load weights. He also noted an existing regional change in disposal destinations and the potential for different gate rates when the county’s trailers are hauled to other landfills.

Commissioners raised competing priorities. Some favored a longer contract to lock in a predictable rate; others, citing volatility in fuel and landfill costs and the court’s limited ability to renegotiate under longer terms, urged a shorter option to preserve leverage. County Judge Executive Jim Gaz framed the choice as a balance between locking in rates and preserving negotiation flexibility.

Staff and Rumpky staff discussed measures they said could reduce hauling frequency, including training transfer‑station crews to maximize trailer weights, use of roll‑off containers for overflow, and adding scales to weigh trailers more precisely. Rumpky said heavier loads would cut the number of hauls per year and could produce savings: moving average loads from 15 to about 20 tons per haul would reduce annual hauls and was projected to save the county on haul fees.

The court instructed staff to finalize paperwork and return a contract-ready agreement reflecting the one‑year term; Rumpky said he would supply updated paperwork for signatures.

Ending: The one‑year hauling contract will take effect immediately upon execution; staff said they would bring finalized contract documents to the county for execution and return next year for further consideration.