Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Street Naming topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents ask Clarksdale to reverse Evans Street renaming; family says process followed law
Summary
Residents of Evans Street urged the Clarksdale Board of Commissioners to reverse a recent street-name change, saying it was done without adequate notice; the family honored by the renaming urged the board to uphold Ordinance 2025.1, and the board voted to table the decision pending more information.
Several residents and neighborhood representatives told the Clarksdale Board of Commissioners on July 15 that a decision to rename Evans Street was made without adequate notice and has imposed burdens on longtime residents.
"This action was taken without consultation with the very people who live there," said Sheila Win, speaking for residents of Evans Street and for Annie Bell Rebels, citing complications for elderly residents who now face costs and confusion changing legal documents and coordinating emergency services and mail delivery.
The mayor and commissioners heard a counterargument from Jetty McBride Mueller, who identified herself as representing the family honored by the new name. McBride Mueller said the prior board followed required legal steps, including a public notice published May 15 in the Clarkdale press register and adoption under what she cited as Ordinance 2025.1 and Mississippi Code annotation 21-3-15. She told commissioners that the petition to reverse the renaming arrived late and contained signatures she said were not validated.
The board did not decide the matter on the spot. A commissioner moved and the board seconded a motion to table the renaming decision while staff gathers additional information about logistics and any outstanding legal or procedural questions; the motion carried.
What happened: During the public-comment period Sheila Win urged the board to consider alternatives that would honor the late resident without changing street addresses, such as a historical marker or an annual commemorative day. Jetty McBride Mueller said the renaming followed published notice and the formal ordinance and asked the board to uphold the prior action.
Why it matters: The change affects residents’ addresses, official records and interactions with emergency services and mail delivery. The dispute raises questions about notice, petition validation and how the city balances commemorative naming with community impact.
Next steps: The board tabled the item to obtain further logistical and legal information. No reversal or final vote occurred at the July 15 meeting.
