Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Police Misconduct topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenter urges outside investigation into alleged Elwood-area police misconduct
Summary
During public comment, Robert Wright alleged that local officers and prosecutors improperly handled cash seizures and court proceedings dating to 2003 and later, and asked for an external investigation; the city attorney told him the council is not the proper body for criminal or prosecutorial actions.
Get email alerts on the Police Misconduct topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At the start of the council meeting, Elwood resident Robert Wright used his allotted public-comment time to make a series of allegations about encounters he says occurred with local law enforcement dating to 2003 and additional incidents he described from later years.
Wright identified himself, presented documents and recounted multiple episodes in which he said officers seized money and that prosecutors and court officers failed to act. He named specific officers and alleged the presence of a "corruption ring" that he said required an investigation outside the local offices. "I believe officers John Wright and Dave Mara will know something about the taking of my money illegally," Wright said, listing witnesses and court dates he said supported his claims.
City attorney Mr. Graham intervened to clarify the forum. "Just as a reminder, this is the council of the city of Elwood. It doesn't necessarily have anything to do" with criminal prosecutions or personnel action, Mr. Graham said, and suggested the speaker was addressing the wrong body for requests that would involve prosecutorial review or police discipline.
Wright said he would need more time to present all his materials and repeatedly asked for an investigation; the council limited him to the public-comment time allotment. No formal directive to initiate an investigation or referral was recorded in the meeting minutes.
The council did not take action on the allegations during the meeting. Because Wright addressed alleged incidents that, if substantiated, might fall under county or state jurisdiction, any formal inquiry would need to be lodged with the appropriate prosecutorial or law-enforcement oversight authorities rather than the city council.

