Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bolton planning commission discusses easing zoning rules to encourage smaller, affordable homes
Summary
At its April 9 meeting, the Bolton Planning & Zoning Commission discussed removing a 1,000-square-foot minimum, permitting duplexes in the R-1 zone, and simplifying the table of uses to reduce special permits — steps members said could expand accessory and affordable housing options.
The Bolton Planning & Zoning Commission met on April 9, 2025 at Bolton Town Hall to begin reviewing possible changes to the town’s subdivision and zoning regulations intended to encourage accessory dwellings and smaller, more affordable housing options.
Chairman Tom Manning said the commission can start simplifying regulations now that recent amendments have been codified to conform with state statutes. He suggested reviewing minimum floor-area rules and other local limits that may impede the development of smaller homes.
Manning raised a proposal, prompted by advocacy from Desegregate Connecticut, to remove Bolton’s local minimum floor-area requirement, currently 1,000 square feet for a single-family house, and to instead rely on HUD and building-code standards. Arlene Fiano recommended that the town reference existing external standards rather than retain a local numeric minimum.
The commission also discussed allowing duplexes in the R-1 zone. Manning noted R-1 is presently designated for single-family housing and that some two-family buildings predate the zoning rules. Manning proposed permitting two-family and potentially three- to four-family homes in R-1. Tom Crockett said the State of Connecticut is pursuing limits on local bans of two-family homes. Commissioners indicated support for allowing duplexes; Fiano said she would back two-family dwellings but not three- to four-family conversions.
Members discussed using a clearer “table of uses” that lists allowed activities by zone to reduce the need for special permits and public hearings. Fiano suggested creating an easy-to-read chart; Manning proposed reviewing examples from other towns and holding a Q&A with local developers. The commission also discussed infrastructure constraints, including shared septic systems that would meet Eastern Highlands Health District standards and outreach to CT Water about aquifer wells and developer interest.
On subdivision rules, the commission considered reinstating a provision for rear lots (Crockett voiced support; Fiano noted rear lots must have their own driveway), allowing more flexibility in lot shape and size to accommodate water and septic restrictions (the town currently requires a 200-by-200-foot lot to set frontage), and reducing exactions for open space while protecting identified conservation areas.
No formal zoning changes or votes on policy amendments were taken at the meeting. The commission approved the March 12, 2025 minutes and adjourned at 8:23 p.m.
