Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Papillion Planning Commission recommends approvals for Sarpie West Industrial Phase 3 rezoning and plats
Summary
At its Feb. 25 meeting the Papillion Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Sarpie West Industrial Phase 3 revised preliminary plat (PP-26-00002), a change of zone (CZ-26001) from A to Limited Industrial, and the final plat (FP-26-00001) after no public opposition was recorded.
Papillion — The Papillion Planning Commission on Feb. 25 recommended approval of three related land-use actions for the Sarpie West Industrial Phase 3 development: the revised preliminary plat (PP-26-00002), a change of zone from A to Limited Industrial (CZ-26001), and the final plat (FP-26-00001). Each recommendation passed by a unanimous 6-0 vote after no members of the public spoke for or against the proposals.
The actions stem from an application by the project applicant represented at the meeting by Larry Jovin, who told commissioners the Phase 3 filing is a revised preliminary plat consistent with phases one and two and includes rezoning to Limited Industrial. Jovin introduced Andrew Coer of TD2 as the consulting engineer and said the team was present to answer questions. "It's just a revised preliminary plat of the phase three of this particular development, very consistent to phase one and two," Jovin said, offering the commission an opportunity for questions.
Why it matters: The trio of approvals clears the way for Phase 3 infrastructure and lot development on land already developed in earlier phases; rezoning to Limited Industrial would change permitted uses on the parcels and affect compatibility with adjacent land uses. Commissioners cited consistency with the comprehensive plan, local zoning and subdivision regulations when moving each recommendation forward.
What happened: The commission opened a public hearing on the revised preliminary plat and asked for public comment; none was offered. A commissioner moved to recommend approval of PP-26-00002 on the basis that it is consistent with the comprehensive plan, zoning and subdivision regulations and compatible with adjacent uses; the motion passed 6-0. The commission then opened and closed the public hearing for the change of zone request (CZ-26001) after no speakers appeared and approved the recommendation to rezone the property from A to Limited Industrial, again citing consistency with the comprehensive plan and regulations. Commissioners noted a clerical typo in the agenda's CZ numbering during that exchange and the clerical discrepancy was characterized as a typographical error.
The final plat (FP-26-00001), which had been moved to the end of the agenda, was discussed as a non-public-hearing item; Jovin said he was available to answer questions and the commission moved to recommend approval, citing the same consistency findings. That motion also passed unanimously (6-0).
No public opposition or staff conditions requiring substantial revisions were recorded in the meeting record. The commission then addressed a question about agenda numbering discrepancies, accepted the explanation that it was a typo, and adjourned the meeting.
The recommendations made by the Planning Commission are advisory; any required final actions or formal approvals will be taken by the City Council or other authorized body according to Papillion's review process.
