Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Farmville delays Hallmark Town subdivision over drainage concerns
Summary
The Farmville Board of Commissioners voted to table final approval of the Hallmark Town subdivision for 30 days after commissioners raised concerns that the eight-lot duplex development could worsen existing drainage and flooding near Field and Pine streets. Staff will gather stormwater and permitting information before the August meeting.
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Farmville Board of Commissioners on a unanimous voice vote agreed to table action on the final plat for the Hallmark Town subdivision until the board's August meeting after extended discussion about stormwater and drainage risks.
Justin, the planner who presented the final subdivision plat from Palco Investments, said the proposal includes eight lots and a common open space, that lot sizes meet the town's R5 zoning requirements, and that the Board of Adjustment had approved a special-use permit to allow duplex units. Staff and the planning board recommended approval so the developer could record the plat and seek building permits.
Several commissioners objected to recording the plat without clearer assurances that the project would not worsen known flooding along the Cotton/Pine/Field Street corridor. "We already have a drainage problem there," Commissioner Evans said, describing pictures board members had seen of standing water and asking what guarantees the town could provide to neighbors if approval led to additional runoff. Commissioner Smith raised safety concerns about new driveways directly onto Field Street and the potential for increased impervious area near existing drainage outfalls.
Justin and other staff said stormwater and erosion control review is handled by state and county permitting bodies and that even if the board approved the plat, developers would still have to obtain those permits before construction. Staff said driveway permits from the state DOT (referred to in the packet) would be required when applicable and that the town typically records such permits before issuing certificates of occupancy.
Board members asked staff to consult with partner agencies including Soil and Water Conservation and to identify what stormwater controls or permits would be required and who would be responsible for any off-site mitigation. The substitute motion to table, made to allow staff to compile a full report and solicit guidance from outside agencies, passed; the board set the next consideration for the August 1 meeting.
The board emphasized that tabling the plat was not a rejection of the development but a request for additional technical information so decision-makers and nearby residents can be confident the project will not exacerbate known flooding issues.

