Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Research topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Alumnus presents study showing mixed results from therapy-dog lessons in Germantown classrooms

Germantown Central School District Board of Education ยท May 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Nina Olsen presented a student-conducted study of animal-assisted pedagogy with the therapy dog Ziggy, reporting modest gains in engagement and mixed evidence on learning and distraction; sample sizes and weak assessments limit firm conclusions.

Nina Olsen, a Germantown alumnus, presented findings from her research into "animal-assisted pedagogy" using the district's therapy dog Ziggy in digital literacy, music and art lessons.

Olsen said the study compared two interaction types: passive presence and active participation by Ziggy. Initial participation numbers were 55 students for the digital-literacy module and more than 70 for art; students saw three 40-minute lessons in some subjects. Olsen described two instruments: a five-point Likert questionnaire on attitudes and a short four- or five-question assessment given immediately and again one month later.

Her results showed small, inconsistent effects. By grade, older students performed marginally better on follow-ups; one anomalous kindergarten result appeared likely due to response noise. On perceived learning and motivation, averages clustered around the middle of the scale (roughly 3 to 4), and most students reported comfort with Ziggy. Distraction outcomes varied: barking was the most commonly reported distraction; in some cases the active-interaction group reported less distraction than passive presence. Olsen cautioned the assessment was "really weak" as a single five-question measure and said a stronger design and repeated lessons would be needed to draw firmer conclusions.

During Q&A, board members were shown data tables and Olsen encouraged review of the full tables provided in print. She concluded the intervention appeared acceptable to students but recommended improved assessment and a longer timeframe to evaluate learning effects.

Olsen's presentation noted teachers were co-design partners and that parental consent processes were used. The results will inform further study and classroom practice if the district elects to expand therapy-dog activities.