Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Charter Revision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Stonington applicants stress listening, legal review and plain language in charter revision interviews
Summary
Applicants interviewed for Stonington’s Charter Revision Commission emphasized listening to residents and officials, reviewing prior commission work, considering technical and clarity edits, and producing a voter‑ready package; multiple candidates said they foresee no conflict of interest.
Candidates interviewed for Stonington’s Charter Revision Commission told the Board of Selectmen they would prioritize listening to residents and town officials, reviewing prior commission work, and proposing technical or plain‑language changes rather than advancing preordained political positions.
Marcia Standish, who identified herself during the meeting, said she has reviewed the charter and the town’s conflict‑of‑interest policy “over and over” and does not anticipate a conflict. She described prior service on a charter commission and said a successful outcome would be completing and presenting recommendations to the board for voter consideration.
Mark Ginsburg, who gave a Stonington address, said the commission should first understand the selectmen’s charge and seek input from multiple government sources to identify problems where the charter may need updating. He cited experience drafting bylaws and serving on nonprofit boards as relevant to careful review and drafting.
Phone applicants made similar points: one caller identified as Scott said the commission should “listen” to citizens and officials, learn from earlier commissions, compare comparable towns and then consider options, including clearer, more accessible language for the charter. Another caller, Scott Muller, questioned whether a commission was needed given recent work and said the first step may be to confirm whether substantive issues remain to be addressed.
Several applicants (including those read from written submissions) highlighted local government experience — service on planning, zoning and finance boards — and said success would be measured by voter approval or by delivering clear recommendations and meeting commission deadlines. The board will vote on establishing and appointing the commission at its March 25 meeting; the packet indicates the commission is expected to begin meeting in early April (the packet names April 1, 2027 as a start date) with any charter changes to be placed on the November 2027 ballot if recommended.
The interviews were procedural; no candidate was appointed at this meeting.
