Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comment Water District topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents raise drainage and small water‑district concerns during public comment

Goshen Town Board · May 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Public commenters urged the town to address a persistent drainage problem on Gates House Road that worsened after roadside maintenance and warned the board that neighbors will oppose a proposed small Amy's Kitchen water district and may pursue legal action if it moves forward without adequate notice.

During the May 28 public comment period, residents raised two recurring local issues: chronic drainage problems made worse by roadside maintenance, and community opposition to a proposed small water district tied to a commercial property.

A resident who identified herself as living at 125 Gates House Road described persistent standing water and a swampy area that she said improved when the town previously cleaned the roadside ditch but later worsened after the highway crew’s vegetation clearing left the ditch filled again. She said the speed‑sign placement and regrowth of weeds have re‑obscured the ditch and asked the highway team to inspect and maintain the culvert and ditch; staff agreed to check the site the following Monday.

Separately, attorney Daniel Crouchar identified himself for the record and said a virtual meeting with town staff confirmed his clients’ concerns about formation of an Amy's Kitchen water district, which he said would include the restaurant property and one additional parcel. He told the board residents would be prepared to commence legal proceedings if the district process proceeded without addressing their objections and questioned whether board members had been aware of private meetings about the topic. Board members responded by noting obligations under open‑meeting rules and said follow‑up discussions should be handled with appropriate notice.

The public comment period also included discussion of town vehicle policy and concerns about advanced life‑support coverage tied to an ambulance district contract in process; those items were noted for follow‑up by staff.