Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Blight Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Norway council reviews tightened blight and dangerous-building ordinance; staff proposes appeal steps
Summary
Councilors reviewed a proposed ordinance consolidating blight and disabled-vehicle rules, clarified enforcement steps for grass and weeds, and discussed appointing a hearing officer and adding an internal appeal to city council before court review.
City staff and councilors reviewed draft revisions to Norway's blight and dangerous-building ordinances that would consolidate disabled-vehicle rules, tighten exceptions for junk vehicles and establish clearer definitions and enforcement steps.
Grant, who appeared in the meeting record as the city attorney, described the draft as three-part: grass and weeds; blight (junk, vehicles, furniture); and dangerous buildings. He said the current grass threshold is 10 inches, with a standard 10-day notice and contractor mowing and billing if owners do not comply. For blight, he said fines and progressive enforcement apply and the city could seek a court order to remove items when necessary.
On dangerous buildings, Grant said the city has not previously used the full hearing-officer process in practice and the draft adds a formal process including appointing a hearing officer, due-process protections and a new right for property owners to appeal a hearing-officer decision to the city council before seeking relief in circuit court.
Councilors debated the scope of the new rules, enforcement costs and the effect of recent criminal-justice shifts that have moved some formerly criminal offenses into civil enforcement; one councilor asked whether legal costs to enforce blight could run into 'the low thousands' depending on circumstances, and staff said courts can award costs and the city can place liens for recoverable expenses.
The draft would also remove many exceptions (for side yards and backyards) in the disabled-vehicle rules and fold them into the larger blight ordinance; councilors cautioned about unintended consequences for seasonal or specialty vehicles (for example, track-related cars kept for events) and asked staff to refine exceptions and administrative procedures.
Councilors requested continued work on the ordinance drafts, suggested forming a workshop or committee to refine language and enforcement triggers, and asked staff to return with clearer cost estimates and implementation mechanics.
The council did not vote on the ordinance during the meeting; staff were directed to continue drafting and to engage relevant stakeholders.
