Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Austin ISD presents special education strategic‑plan update after release from Reed order
Summary
District leaders told trustees the special education strategic plan has moved from planning to sustained implementation and said Austin ISD was formally released from the Reed order on Feb. 17; presenters outlined five goals, 140+ actions and next steps including quality standards publication and family engagement events.
Austin ISD administrators told trustees on April 9 that the district’s multi‑year special education strategic plan has transitioned from planning to sustained, districtwide implementation following the district’s Feb. 17 release from the Reed order and state oversight.
Dr. Jennifer Baker, director of compliance and reporting, said the plan centers on five goals — shared ownership, high‑quality instruction, timely evaluations, high‑quality IEP development and resource alignment — supported by roughly 140 actionable strategies now being institutionalized in district operations. "Following its finalization last June 2024, we maintained a schedule of quarterly board updates," Dr. Baker said, and staff reported that most action items are completed or have been established as permanent systems.
Presenters described progress on evaluations and staffing: the district reported completing thousands of initial and re‑evaluations during the current school year and described a large, coordinated testing effort during spring break that mobilized dozens of district evaluators. Staff said they are centralizing some evaluation functions and planning for summer evaluation dates to manage rising referral volumes and the administrative burden of private‑school evaluation requests, which can be more expensive and time consuming.
The presentation also noted creation of the Austin ISD Special Education Quality Standards, intended as a district‑wide blueprint; staff said publication of detailed service standards would follow and would be tied to onboarding and professional learning for staff. Trustee questions focused on disaggregating outcomes for students dismissed from special education, tracking family engagement event participation, and the budgetary implications of increasing evaluation workloads; staff said they would provide additional data and follow up with the board.
Trustees praised increased transparency and asked staff to continue refining metrics that show year‑after outcomes for students who exit special education and to report back with disaggregated analyses for literacy and other targeted interventions. The administration said it will continue quarterly updates and bring follow‑up materials to future meetings.
