Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Litter And Recycling topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
North Adams council pauses proposed nip‑bottle ban as private redemption effort continues
Summary
The council voted to postpone drafting an ordinance to ban single‑use “nip” alcoholic bottles, citing an ongoing private redemption program that has collected tens of thousands of bottles and questions about enforcement and impacts on businesses and residents.
The North Adams City Council on March 10 postponed consideration of an ordinance that would prohibit sales of single‑use "nip" alcoholic bottles after hearing that a private collection and redemption program has collected roughly 40,000 bottles.
Council President Ashley Shade opened the discussion and Councilor Sapienza reported that the Public Safety Committee had reviewed council paper 12,525 and recommended delaying any ordinance drafting until after the private program’s results can be evaluated once snow cover has melted. "The committee voted to delay until the first meeting of May," Sapienza said, noting the committee’s unanimous support.
Supporters of the private collection effort described early success. "About 40,000 nip bottles have been collected," Councilor Sapienza told the council, adding organizers hope to reach 50,000 and take a photo to press the state to expand bottle‑bill redemption. Sapienza said roughly $2,500 in private donations have funded payouts so far and cautioned the fund may run low.
Councilors asked whether complaints about litter had declined and raised practical concerns about a local ban. "We really don't want to ban these outright right now because of the burden it might place on some of the businesses who sell these in the city," Councilor McCarron said. Councilors and presenters discussed alternatives including more public trash and recycling containers and targeted placement in identified litter "ground zero" areas such as the Ashlin Street corridor.
Several council members also referenced experiences in other nearby communities. Councilor Sapienza said Pittsfield examined a ban but stopped over concerns about whether such a restriction could produce unintended consequences for people with alcohol dependence and because some programs showed mixed behavioral outcomes.
A motion to postpone the ordinance to the council's first May meeting carried. The council left open further study of the privately run redemption program and asked for follow‑up information ahead of the May return date.
Next steps: the paper was postponed to the first council meeting in May for further review; councilors asked that staff and volunteers provide updated data on redemption volumes, funding status, and any observed changes in complaints or litter levels.
