Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Consumer Protection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lyman trustees debate door-to-door sales permit amid enforcement and privacy concerns
Summary
Board members discussed a proposal to require permits for out-of-town door-to-door sales, raising enforcement capacity, liability and privacy issues and suggesting alternatives such as a non-solicitation list or educational outreach; staff suggested waiting for a broader ordinance review by SNPDC.
Carrie Joe Samson introduced a proposal at the Jan. 5 Lyman Select Board meeting to allow the town to require permits for door-to-door sales by businesses not based in Lyman, saying the measure would help residents verify a solicitor's credentials online.
"I just think it would be a great way for folks to be able to check when people come to their door," Carrie Joe Samson said, describing a permit that would be listed on the town website.
Board members welcomed the intent but raised several implementation questions. Members noted the town lacks a police force and questioned who would enforce permit rules and investigate complaints when a resident reports a solicitor without a permit. Several members urged caution about creating new liabilities if the town publishes a do-not-solicit or non-solicitation list containing residents' addresses.
Janette urged the board to consider liability and recommended including a clear disclaimer if the town maintains a public list: the town should not guarantee that being on the list will prevent visits nor endorse licensed sellers. A separate group of members suggested alternatives to a permit requirement, including expanded public education (how to spot scams), signage (no solicitors), and an online registry of businesses that voluntarily register rather than a mandatory permit.
Several members said they preferred to wait until SNPDC completes a planned review of Lyman's ordinances before drafting a new local requirement. The board did not take a vote; members asked staff to gather examples from comparably sized towns and sample ordinance language (including liability disclaimers) to inform a future decision.
Board members concurred that any pilot or program would require research into staffing, enforcement costs and possible state tax implications for incentive programs such as senior volunteer tax credits, which were also discussed elsewhere on the agenda.
