Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Deer Springs Phase3 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Deer Springs Phase 3 moved to March meeting after residents press safety, access and maintenance concerns
Summary
The commission continued review of Deer Springs Phase 3 to March 19 to allow staff and the developer to respond to residents’ concerns about road safety, dog‑park access in winter, snow storage, stormwater routing and HOA maintenance. Staff flagged retaining‑wall heights covered by the MDA and confirmed park acreage meets the MDA requirement.
Get email alerts on the Deer Springs Phase3 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Hideout Planning Commission continued consideration of Deer Springs Phase 3 at its Feb. 19 meeting after extended public comment and technical discussion.
Phase 3 is part of the larger Deer Springs development (248 units overall) and proposes 27 townhouse units, a people’s park, a dog park, pickleball courts, a pavilion and trail connections to earlier phases. Staff said the parks combined meet the MDA requirement for 3.5 acres of recreational space (staff cited 2.54 acres for the people park and 1.13 acres for the dog park).
Technical notes: staff warned that retaining walls adjacent to SR‑248 in Phase 3 will exceed the town’s typical 10‑foot limit but are allowed under the previously adopted MDA; the town will require standard mitigation measures (landscaping and stepped terraces) and final engineering. Stormwater will tie into the project’s drainage system; staff said final design and a demonstration of stormwater compliance will be required before plat recordation.
Public comment focused on safety and maintenance: residents asked for permanent traffic-calming measures on Ascent/Bell Way (reports of high speeds), winter access and plowing to ensure people can reach the dog park and community amenities in snowy months, better on-site snow-storage placements so emergency access is not obstructed, and more consistent site cleanup by builders and the HOA. Several speakers voiced wildfire concerns and urged firewise landscaping. The developer acknowledged the concerns and committed to further coordination with staff and the HOA; staff, the applicant and the town engineer will report back with technical clarifications.
Action: commissioners moved to continue the item to the March 19 meeting to allow staff and the developer to provide follow-up information (snow-management plan, final engineering clarifications, easement and utility‑relocation responsibilities and options for parking/ADA/winter access to the parks). The motion carried.
Why it matters: Phase 3 will add housing and the town’s only enclosed dog park; residents emphasized that amenities intended for public use should be safely accessible year-round and that maintenance responsibilities must be clear before the project advances.
Next steps: staff will work with the developer to provide technical responses and revised exhibits for the March 19 meeting, and will consider options for radar signage or other traffic calming, placement of visitor parking near the dog park, and maintenance/operational agreements for publicly accessible HOA amenities.

