Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hillsboro holds first readings on annexation and two sign-code changes; no public comment

Hillsboro City Council · June 18, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council opened and closed public hearings and first readings for a voluntary annexation of roughly 49.57 acres and for two amendments to the 2007 sign regulations (LED signs and outlet-mall overlay signage); Planning & Zoning recommended approval for each and only one notification response asked for clarification.

Hillsboro council held first readings and public hearings on a voluntary annexation request and two proposed amendments to the 2007 zoning ordinance concerning signage. Planning and Zoning had forwarded recommendations on each item.

On the annexation, staff described a request to initiate voluntary annexation proceedings for approximately 49.57 acres in the FM right survey (abstract 964). Planning and Zoning recommended annexation and applying SF-7 single-family residential zoning with an increased-density overlay. Staff said only one person in the 20-day notice area responded requesting clarification; no one from the public spoke at the hearing.

Council also held the first reading of an amendment to incorporate LED signs into the permanent-sign schedule and to add a definition for LED signs. The proposed changes would allow LED faces on certain sign types (off-premise, pylon, monument) under the existing size, height, and quantity limits and would require messages to be displayed for a minimum of eight seconds, with message changes completed within two seconds and occurring simultaneously across the sign face.

A second ordinance presented for first reading would amend the outlet-mall redevelopment overlay to allow limited off-premise signage options, permit multiple businesses to share a pole/pylon with separate sign cabinets, and prohibit a business from having duplicate pole/monument signs of the same category. Planning and Zoning recommended both ordinances for approval. Each first reading opened a public hearing and closed with no public commenters; the items will return for further consideration on second reading.