Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Landuse topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board takes positions on multiple upcoming zoning hearings, opposes one fence variance and sends neutral positions on several generator and farm requests
Summary
The board voted to oppose Patricia Patterson’s fence‑height variance and to take neutral positions on applications for an agricultural shed setback (Dwight and Susan Elely), an emergency generator (Brenda Ortega) and a generator appeal (Breen). The board also decided to notify the zoning hearing board of a pending ordinance effort affecting B17 subdivisions.
At its Jan. 20 meeting the Upper Makefield Township Board of Supervisors reviewed four zoning hearing board applications and recorded the township’s positions to be delivered to the zoning hearing board ahead of hearings scheduled Jan. 27 and Jan. 30.
The board voted to oppose a variance requested by Patricia Patterson for a 6‑foot fence along the front of her Windy Bush Road property where 4 feet is permitted, citing neighbor feedback about setbacks and visibility and concluding the board would send a letter stating opposition to the zoning hearing board.
The board voted to take a neutral position on Dwight and Susan Elely’s request for a 70‑foot setback for an animal shed/manure storage where 100 feet is required, noting the property is in an agricultural security district and that a supporting neighbor submitted a letter in the township packet. The Elelys said they have a nutrient management plan and obtained a grant to build the loafing barn.
For Brenda Ortega’s application (emergency generator sideyard/rearyard setback variances) the board likewise voted to remain neutral and allow the zoning hearing board to decide. For the Breen appeal and generator variance in a B17 elderly subdivision, the board took a neutral position and asked staff to send a letter informing the zoning hearing board of the concurrent ordinance work that could affect B17 generator placement, while clarifying the letter should not assert that the ordinance is adopted.
The board’s positions are advisory comments to the zoning hearing board (which makes the final rulings). Patricia Patterson later addressed the board during public comment and asked that the township convey the safety rationale to the zoning hearing board when it meets.
