Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Garden City council approves 'The Strand' final plat but denies five-year entitlement extension
Summary
The council approved the final plat SUBFY 2025003 for a six-unit infill project called The Strand, removed a required trash easement, approved public art via design review, and denied the applicant’s request for a five-year entitlement period at the project outset.
The Garden City Council approved the final plat SUBFY 2025003 (the project known as "The Strand"), finding the application in substantial compliance with the preliminary plat and granting related waivers while denying the applicant’s request for a five-year entitlement period at the time of approval.
Applicant representative Hannah Ball described the project and the changes from the preliminary plat, saying the final proposal sits in the Live Work Create district and provides six attached units with about 16% open space, two parking stalls per unit and a private drive. Architect Ian Mclofflin described design changes including recessed front decks, removal of rooftop decks (reducing building height by roughly two feet) and rooftop mechanical screening.
Ball also asked for an upfront five-year entitlement period, arguing that agency review and third-party utility approvals can take months: "five gives us the comfort of vertically coming out having the appropriate conversations and really looking at our site..." she said. City staff and the development director explained the city’s process: the two-year clock starts on approval tonight with a possible one-year extension and the city offers a restricted build agreement to secure the subdivision while enabling staged civil and building work.
Council members debated policy implications of granting an extended entitlement. Council President Page and others praised the design and added open space, but several members expressed hesitation about setting a five-year entitlement precedent. The council’s motion approved the final plat, removed the trash-easement requirement in the decision document, required that the proposed public art go through the city’s design-review (Danielle Herd as the city art liaison will review), and denied the request for the wholesale five-year entitlement at this stage.
The clerk recorded Council Members Carver Herbert, Paige and Rasmmanson voting yes; the motion passed. Staff noted the restricted build agreement and any building permits will require compliance with conditions of approval and that the applicant could return for extensions in the future under existing code.
Actions taken: approval of SUBFY 2025003 (final plat) with conditions; trash easement abandoned; art design-review requirement added; request for five-year entitlement denied. Vote: unanimous among council members present.
