Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wildlife Engagement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Save Arlington Wildlife proposes ‘critter cam’ at Great Meadows; commission asks for formal plan
Summary
At the May 21 meeting the Arlington Conservation Commission heard a proposal from Save Arlington Wildlife to install one or two off‑trail wildlife cameras at Great Meadows. Commissioners raised privacy and placement concerns and asked the group to submit a short proposal with photos, locations, signage and duration for review and possible recommendation to the select board.
Laura Keiesel, a member of Save Arlington Wildlife, asked the Arlington Conservation Commission on May 21 to allow the group to place one or two “critter cams” — camera traps — at off‑trail locations in Great Meadows to engage the public with local wildlife.
“I just thought it might be nice if Save Arlington Wildlife hosted a critter cam, maybe one to start, maybe two, at a couple of locations at Great Meadows,” Keiesel told the commission. She said the cameras could either livestream or post stills and that she was open to either format.
Commissioners welcomed the idea but raised privacy and operational questions. “I think we need to know where they’re going to go, how long they’re going to be there and how the data will be used,” said David White, a commission member. Members emphasized that cameras should be sited away from main trails and labeled so they are not misconstrued as public surveillance.
Acting Chair Susan Chapnik summarized the commission’s guidance: prepare a short, illustrated proposal with exact locations, indicate whether it will be livestreamed or provide stills, identify where images will be posted for public access, and include signage language and anticipated trial duration. Chapnik said the commission would review the proposal in a public meeting and then route a recommendation to the town manager or select board as appropriate. “Make it short and sweet and put pictures in,” Chapnik said.
Commissioners suggested coordinating with the Friends of Arlington Great Meadows and notifying the select board so the town can respond to any public feedback. The commission did not take a formal vote on the proposal at the May 21 meeting; instead, staff and the applicant were asked to schedule the item for a forthcoming meeting after the applicant submits the requested materials.
Next steps: Save Arlington Wildlife will prepare a proposal with photos, pin‑pointed locations, a note about signage and a proposed trial duration; staff will place the item on a future agenda and notify the select board or town manager as needed.
