Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Minutes Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Discussion on minutes prompts call to read motions back before votes
Summary
Board members debated how motions and minutes should be recorded after a member said a past motion’s intent was unclear; one member asked that the planner read back exact motion wording when debates become complex.
During review of the January 21 minutes, a planning board member said the minutes left the wording of a motion unclear and that the board’s understanding of what they were voting on differed. The speaker requested that, when motions are complex or amended, the town planner (Chilani) read back the exact wording of the motion before a vote so members can be certain about what they are approving.
Other members responded that minutes should clearly reflect the motion, who made it, who seconded and the vote; they cautioned against producing verbatim pages of discussion and said the existing minutes already record the motion, amendment and roll-call vote. One member summarized their recollection that the original motion had been to send a letter to Maurice's Campground, and that the chair and town planner were tasked with drafting the letter.
Board members agreed that if an individual is uncertain during a meeting they may ask for the motion to be read back, but there was no new formal rule adopted at this meeting. The board then moved to approve the January 21 minutes. A motion to approve was made and seconded; Alfred and at least one other member abstained because they had not attended the prior meeting, and the motion passed with the votes necessary to carry it.
The board had no further liaison reports or correspondence and adjourned the meeting by unanimous vote.
