Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the General Plan Update topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff outlines general-plan update process and outreach: 650+ survey responses, draft vision to Planning Commission June 18
Summary
City staff and consultants described the comprehensive general plan update process, summarized outreach (more than 650 survey responses and a community open house with about 100 attendees) and set near-term milestones: Planning Commission review June 18 and City Council review July 14.
City planning staff and consultants opened a study session with the Los Altos Historical Commission to solicit input on the community vision for a comprehensive general plan update and to summarize outreach and next steps.
Senior planner Britney Whiteill, project manager for the update, described outreach to date and the project's purpose. "We've received more than 650 survey responses, engaged with several hundreds of community members through various pop-up events, and we had a really successful community open house back in April at Rand Park with over a hundred attendees," she said. The consultant Andrew Hill emphasized that the planning process will include four phases over roughly two years: visioning, alternatives/scenario development, drafting (including an Environmental Impact Report), and adoption.
Staff noted the legal framework: California cities must maintain a general plan that covers mandatory topics (land use, transportation, housing, conservation, safety, noise and others) and ensure consistency across implementing tools such as zoning and the capital-improvement program. Staff also explained that the Planning Commission will act as the formal recommending body and that the draft community vision and guiding principles are slated for Planning Commission review on June 18 and for City Council review on July 14.
Commissioners and public commenters used the session to surface local priorities (tree protection, preservation of village character, parking and circulation, aging-population needs, and housing pressures stemming from state mandates). Staff committed to including the full outreach record—comment cards, pop-up notes and survey responses—in the public packet for both commissions and council so minority ideas and recurring themes are visible.
No formal actions on policy or plan structure were taken at the study session; staff invited written input and attendance at upcoming hearings.
