Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Vista Verde Project topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Orinda commissioners order study session after preschool parents say Vista Verde plans threaten TOPS' outdoor classroom and access

Orinda Planning Commission · May 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Parents and trustees of TOPS preschool told the Orinda Planning Commission they were not notified of changes to the Vista Verde senior‑housing project and described construction impacts that could close the preschool’s Irwin Way access, reduce enrollment, and expose children to dust and diesel emissions; the commission voted unanimously to schedule a May 26 study session for fact‑finding and staff follow‑up.

Kristen Armenini, director of TOPS preschool, told the Orinda Planning Commission on May 12 that TOPS — a nonprofit co‑op preschool operating on the community church grounds since 1944 — was not included in planning or approval discussions for the Vista Verde project and that construction would “permanently and irrevocably change” the school’s outdoor classroom. “Our voice was never sought, never heard, and never recognized,” she said.

Several parents, trustees and a school‑board member expanded on those concerns in a packed public‑comment period. They said retaining walls and planned construction fencing appear to encroach on TOPS’ play yard, that recent contractor materials indicate the project design has changed since the 2022 approvals, and that construction sequencing could close Irwin Way — the preschool’s only access route — during parts of the build. “If Irwin Way is closed, access to the preschool will be eliminated. That’s an immediate safety, operational and family‑access concern,” said a parent who identified himself as Anthony Bald S.

Tony Martinez, TOPS board president, said TOPS signed its current lease in 2023 and that the lease language grants the school exclusive use of the premises described in the lease exhibit; he alleged the church landlord did not notify the tenant of the pending project. Steve Austin, a TOPS board member, urged the city to press for remedies including redesigns to eliminate construction encroachment, an independent study of noise and air impacts, limits on heavy‑equipment work during preschool hours, traffic rerouting to protect drop‑off and pick‑up, and screening to block views into the play yard.

Planning staff told the commission the Vista Verde application was submitted in September 2021, the planning commission held a hearing on July 12, 2022, and the city council approved the project on Aug. 16, 2022; staff said the environmental document and a mitigated negative declaration were completed as part of that process. Staff also explained the city’s statutory noticing obligation: the planning process requires notification of property owners, not tenants, and an affidavit of mailing to property owners is the typical legal notice record.

Commissioners repeatedly noted parts of the dispute — lease terms and alleged failures to notify tenants — are civil matters outside the commission’s authority. Still, several commissioners said the commission should gather facts and clarify what, if anything, has changed since 2022. Commissioner Morola moved — and the commission unanimously approved — a motion to place this topic on the May 26 agenda as a study session and to request that staff present a concise summary of the project status, what was approved in 2022, what is currently in building‑permit review, and any identified departures from the approved plans.

What happens next: staff will prepare a factual report for the May 26 study session and the commission will hear public comment again when that item is agendized. The action does not reopen or undo prior approvals; it is a fact‑finding and information‑gathering step to identify whether additional mitigations or other responses are appropriate.