Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Board Business topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board endorses site‑review agreements, accepts minutes and reviews engineering contract proposal
Summary
At its March 24 meeting the New Boston Planning Board endorsed site‑review agreements for Paul D. Sizemore and Michael & Lorraine Gagnon, approved draft minutes from Jan. 27, and discussed a proposed two‑year engineering services contract to be reviewed at the next meeting.
Get email alerts on the Planning Board Business topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The New Boston Planning Board on March 24 handled multiple routine items, endorsing site‑review agreements, approving draft minutes and reviewing a late contract proposal for engineering services.
The board endorsed a site‑review agreement for property owned by Paul D. Sizemore on Wood Road. Staff reminded members that outstanding site improvements documented on the approved plan must be completed and that the condition‑subsequent items must be fulfilled by Jan. 13, 2027; staff said a compliance hearing will be scheduled once those items are certified complete. When asked to state his name, the applicant said, "Paul Sizemore," and confirmed he had obtained a sign permit from Ed Hunter and that necessary internal signs would be installed before the compliance hearing.
The board also reviewed a site‑review agreement for Michael and Lorraine Gagnon for a North Bass Road property; staff said this proposal includes a building addition and therefore has more outstanding conditions than the Sizemore file. Board members discussed obtaining property‑owner permission for any sidewalk inspection.
On minutes, the board distributed and approved the draft minutes from Jan. 27, 2026 without comment. Staff also provided updated subdivision and stormwater worksheets and presented a late proposal for a two‑year engineering services contract, offering to upload the previously endorsed contract for members to compare hourly pricing; staff suggested the board could defer action until the April 14 meeting to allow review.
Next steps: staff will schedule required compliance hearings as applicants complete outstanding conditions, upload contract documentation for member review, and return the engineering contract for consideration at the next meeting.
