Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Civil Rights Preemption topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Human Rights Commission warns council about new state limits on local civil-rights ordinances
Summary
A Human Rights Commission representative told the council that Senate File 579, effective March 10, restricts a city's ability to enact ordinances that provide protections broader than the Iowa Civil Rights Act, and raised questions about commissioner term lengths and local ordinance authority.
During the public forum on April 6, T.W. Eggum, speaking on behalf of the Cedar Falls Human Rights Commission, briefed the council on changes in recent state legislation and urged council members to note implications for local policy.
Eggum said the legislation (Senate File 579) contains a new provision in section 216.19 that restricts local governments from adopting ordinances that are broader or contain different protected categories than those in the Iowa Civil Rights Act. He quoted the language: "A city or local government shall not enact any ordinance or other law which is broader or has different categories of unfair or discriminatory practices than those provided in this chapter." He cited as an example last year’s removal of gender identity as a protected class at the state level and noted that cities that previously included such protections in local ordinances now face restrictions.
Eggum also flagged a change in commissioner term lengths referenced in the new law and said he was not a lawyer, so he could not offer a definitive interpretation about retroactivity or how the change applies to existing local ordinances and commission terms. He offered to answer council questions and encouraged officials to consult legal counsel for formal interpretation and next steps.
The council did not take action on the item during the meeting; the comment was recorded during the public forum and accepted as input to city officials.
