Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves $72,000+ security camera and server purchase for Riverside Park; staff describe audio/air‑quality sensors
Summary
The council authorized a not‑to‑exceed security upgrade (cameras, a central expandable server and Triton sensors) aimed at reducing vandalism and loitering at Riverside Park and other city properties; staff said the system can alert police to loitering and detect some audio/air‑quality signals but would not record inside restrooms.
The Civic Center Authority approved a purchase to upgrade park and city‑owned building surveillance, authorizing staff to accept vendor quotes and install a central server to consolidate camera feeds across the city. The motion, approved by roll call, set a not‑to‑exceed amount of $72,026.98.
Andrew Henderson presented two proposals: a local installer (Absolute Security) to upgrade cameras at the splash pad and a back‑end solution (Entre Solutions) for the central server and licensing. Henderson said the city selected Riverside Park (also referred to in meeting materials as Humiston/Homestead Riverside Park) as the initial focus because the site has experienced vandalism and after‑hours loitering.
Henderson described a Triton sensor device planned for locking‑area monitoring (bathrooms) and said the unit “doesn’t record, it just monitors the audio and air quality” and can flag prolonged occupancy, loud noises, glass breakage, detection of some vape/smoke signatures and, in his words, even gunfire detection; those alerts would generate emails to a patrol address so officers could check the scene. He also said many cameras proposed for the project are license‑plate‑capture capable and that the Milestone software‑based server would be expandable to support future access‑control functions.
Council and staff discussed camera placement, tree‑line line‑of‑sight challenges for radio links, and the plan to give the police department remote access to camera feeds from squad cars. Henderson said the centralized server would make it easier to know when a camera or recorder was down and to expand coverage in later phases.
The motion approved a combined not‑to‑exceed contract amount after one member restated the exact figure as $72,026.98. The roll call recorded unanimous Yes votes.
Privacy and scope: Henderson emphasized the Triton sensor “does not record” and framed the system as a tool to deter or document criminal damage and to alert patrol officers to loitering; the transcript does not include a formal privacy impact assessment or written policy about retention or access controls.
What happens next: Staff will finalize vendor agreements, deploy the server and cameras per the approved quotes and work with police on access and alerting procedures. The council noted the server is intended to be expandable for future additions like electronic access control.
