Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legal Outside Counsel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board moves to consider hiring outside counsel for litigation; conflict allegation noted
Summary
The Harrison County board introduced an order to employ Timothy Hollowman and Boyce Hollow Associates to represent the county in listed litigation matters and discussed an allegation of a conflict of interest involving Peter A. Biden and April Reading; the motion was seconded and a vote was called but the transcript does not record the tally.
Get email alerts on the Legal Outside Counsel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Harrison County board introduced an order to engage Timothy Hollowman and Boyce Hollow Associates to represent the county in several pending litigation matters. A staff member told the board that the proposed order "includes a waiver" and noted an allegation had been raised that the county had a conflict in representing Peter A. Biden, his firm, and April Reading; the staff member said the county would waive such a conflict if one exists.
The motion to adopt the order was moved and seconded. The presiding officer called for those in favor; the transcript does not record a roll-call or the vote tally.
Why it matters: Hiring outside counsel can shift legal strategy and budget responsibility to contracted attorneys; any conflict waiver affects whether the county can jointly represent related parties. The staff member advised the board about the potential conflict as a precautionary measure.
Details: The item was presented as "item 62," described in the meeting as "an order adjudicating employment of Timothy Hollowman and Boyce Hollow Associates to represent [Harrison County] in litigation matters listed below." A staff member said for the record that the order "also includes a waiver" related to an inquiry alleging a conflict and that the county would waive that conflict if appropriate.
Next steps: The board called for the vote after the motion and second, but the transcript does not include the outcome or vote tally. The record supplied here notes only what was said aloud during the public meeting.

