Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Planning Master Plan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents press city on Yacht Club cleanup and urge adding city parcel 108 to master plan

Local Planning Agency / Planning & Zoning Board · March 13, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Residents asked city staff to act on an eyesore at the Treasure Island Yacht Club and commissioners discussed adding city-owned parcel 108 to the ongoing master-plan process, citing potential marina, fuel and public–private partnership uses.

During public questions about property conditions, residents raised concerns that the Treasure Island Yacht Club grounds had debris and needed cleanup. A resident asked whether staff had contacted the club and whether code enforcement could require property maintenance. John Goodrich said he had not personally spoken with the yacht club but that community development and the city's code team "are having conversations with all property owners" and that complaints can be filed by email at codes@mytreasureisland.org.

Committee members then turned to master-plan strategy, noting the city's recent capital investment in a police and fire building near 108 and suggesting that the remaining city-owned two acres of the approximately 3.2-acre holding present opportunities for a marina, fuel distribution or public–private partnerships. One committee member said there had been consensus at a recent city commission meeting to add city-owned parcels to the master-plan RFQ where appropriate.

Members discussed timing and implementation: staff and commissioners said the master-plan process can accommodate adding some city parcels even if they were not included in the initial RFQ; Joan (appointed to the master-plan staff team) will help lead financial feasibility analysis for the redevelopment component. A committee member urged visible local projects to show outside developers that the city is moving forward and noted that internal development should proceed alongside outreach to attract outside investors.

On process, the board confirmed its practice of holding an LPA session in conjunction with PNZ meetings to accommodate last-minute items and heavy caseloads. The public-comment period concluded with praise for the meeting; a motion to adjourn was made and the meeting closed without a detailed roll-call vote recorded in the transcript.

The transcript records staff taking the Yacht Club concern "on the radar" and referring it to code enforcement; it does not record a formal enforcement action, a timeline for remediation, or a developer commitment for parcel 108.