Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Night Parking topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee holds proposed night-parking ordinance amendment for further edits

Improvement Services Committee · May 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Improvement Services Committee voted May 27 to hold a proposed amendment to City of Green Bay ordinance section 20-29 (night parking) so staff can incorporate late comments and finalize language; the change would formalize existing practice and add an approval path for exceptions beyond overnight allowances.

The Improvement Services Committee on May 27 voted to hold a proposed amendment to City of Green Bay ordinance section 20-29, which governs night parking, to allow staff and the law department time to incorporate last-minute comments and tweak the draft language.

A Public Works staff member told the committee the proposal is meant to reflect current practice rather than create a new policy: “We were working on updating our ordinance to reflect practice that has been ongoing for many years,” and asked the committee to “hold the item to the next meeting so we can make some small adjustments, and we'll bring it back.” The draft would also add a process by which the committee and Common Council could approve requests that exceed routine overnight allowances.

Alders asked for clarifications about the proposed limits. Alder De Baker and Alderwoman Vitale discussed how the rule would operate in practice; staff clarified that the draft sets a cap of six overnight instances up to two weeks at a time (commonly read as six overnights per request, repeatable in separate two-week periods), and that requests exceeding those allowances would need further committee and council approval.

After discussion, Alder Rider Bush moved to hold the item to the committee's June 10 meeting so staff could work with the law department and circulate an updated draft; Alder De Baker seconded the motion. The motion passed and the ordinance will return to the Improvement Services Committee for final consideration before a recommendation is forwarded to the Common Council.

The committee’s action is advisory: any ordinance change approved by this committee will be a recommendation to the Common Council, which will make any final decision at its next meeting.