Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Crescent Springs council approves sewer easement for Buttermilk Town Center parcel

Crescent Springs City Council · March 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Crescent Springs City Council unanimously passed Ordinance 2026-1 on Feb. 23, authorizing the mayor to execute a permanent sewer easement from property known as Buttermilk Town Center to an adjacent parcel at 2301 Anderson Road to complete an earlier, partly executed agreement.

The Crescent Springs City Council voted 6–0 on Feb. 23 to approve Ordinance 2026-1, granting a permanent sewer easement that conveys a small portion of the Buttermilk Town Center property to an adjacent lot at 2301 Anderson Road. The ordinance authorizes the mayor to execute all documents necessary to complete the conveyance.

Council members described the easement as a minor, corrective conveyance intended to finish paperwork and fulfill an agreement reached years earlier. “It’s very small just to clean this up,” a council member said, characterizing the parcel as roughly “10x5.”

The ordinance text identifies the city as the record owner of the parcel described by county deed references and names RGMZ Buttermilk Town Center OP1 HO LLC and John Spilly LLC as the other parties to the easement. Officials said the move resolves an incomplete set of documents tied to a long-term bond agreement on the property.

The measure passed on a roll-call vote; the clerk recorded six affirmative votes and no dissent. Council indicated no further action is required beyond execution of the conveyance documents by the mayor.

The council took the vote during its regular meeting after completing roll call and routine reports. No amendments or conditions were recorded in the adopted motion, and staff did not list a separate implementation schedule at the meeting.