Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Curriculum Transparency topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public commenters press Putnam County School Board to release Ripple Effects materials

Putnam County School Board · May 27, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Three public commenters urged the Putnam County School Board to publish and grant unfettered access to Ripple Effects and Educator Ally social-emotional-learning materials, citing a Nassau County court ruling and Chapter 119 public-records concerns.

Three public commenters told the Putnam County School Board on May 27 that the district must provide full public access to Ripple Effects and related professional-development materials, saying restricted reviews and vendor limits have undermined parents’ rights and public-records law.

Kathleen Murray, state education director for Citizens Defending Freedom, said materials purchased with taxpayer dollars are public records and asked the board for “immediate full compliance with Florida law, unrestricted access to all Ripple Effects and Educator Ally materials, and an end to any practices that obstruct lawful transparency.” Murray cited a Nassau County court ruling she said ordered full access and awarded attorney fees for prior public-records litigation.

Marsha Metzker said she and others were restricted during an April 22 review to taking only handwritten notes and could not copy or capture screenshots. Metzker told the board she will provide a chronology of public-records requests and a cost-per-pupil analysis and asked that the district publish the materials and documentation so the public may inspect them.

Jack Knocky, who said he traveled from Fernandina Beach and has litigated for access to Ripple Effects in Nassau County, described what he said were vendor and district barriers to transparency. He alleged the curriculum includes a “brain journal” that parents are not permitted to see, that students are asked about a “trusted adult” who is not necessarily a parent, and that some materials “promote an alternative spirituality.” He also alleged the curriculum could direct students to outside providers such as Planned Parenthood; he urged the board to preserve and publish records and said advocates will return if records are destroyed or withheld.

Board members acknowledged the concerns and thanked the speakers; several members said they would try to assemble and review the materials for transparency. No formal action, policy change, or vote on the Ripple Effects materials was taken during the meeting.

Why it matters: The speakers linked the issue to two state legal references cited during comments — Chapter 119 (Florida Public Records Act) and Chapter 1014 (Parents’ Bill of Rights) — and asked the district to treat curriculum materials purchased with public funds as inspectable records. The board did not make a commitment to a specific remedial step during the meeting, leaving the request unresolved and likely to return to future agendas.