Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Landscaping topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board asks for clearer Perez screening plan after neighbors press for species, placement and maintenance details

Union Vale Zoning Board of Appeals · January 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The ZBA reviewed Mr. Perez's landscaping plan required by a prior variance and asked for clearer species/size, placement, irrigation/maintenance and replacement guarantees; neighbors and applicant were asked to stake and agree the run and to return with a revised plan or documentation.

The board reviewed a landscaping plan submitted by Mr. Perez to satisfy a condition attached to an October variance that required a horticulturalist-designed visual screen. The applicant presented a contract with Alpine Tree Service proposing ten 10-foot arborvitae and said he had signed the contract and intends to plant the trees to screen neighbors from structures and storage areas.

Board members and neighbors raised technical questions: the exact variety and mature width of arborvitae, whether the contractor’s proposal guarantees survival or watering, who will be responsible for irrigation and replacement if trees fail, and whether a mixed-planting approach (e.g., white pine plus arborvitae) would better meet screening needs while limiting encroachment on the applicant’s yard. A neighbor pressed for trees to be sited roughly six feet inside property lines as part of what was described as a 12-foot mutual buffer; the board suggested applicants stake proposed locations and discuss placement with neighbors before planting.

The board requested a revised plan specifying species, initial height, expected mature spread, maintenance obligations (watering and replacement on mortality) and clearer mapping of where the run of screening will extend (board members estimated roughly 150 feet of run where screening would be needed). The applicant was told the board could consider the revised plan via staff review if the materials are sufficiently detailed, or require him to appear at a subsequent meeting; the applicant agreed to coordinate with neighbors and to return with clarification once snow and season permit site staking.