Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Fee Schedule topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

St. Francis council adopts updated fee schedule in second reading

St. Francis City Council · November 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its Nov. 17 meeting, the St. Francis City Council adopted Ordinance 351, a second-reading amendment to the city fee schedule, and authorized its summary publication. Councilors said the changes respond to routine housekeeping and revenue needs.

The St. Francis City Council voted Nov. 17 to adopt Ordinance 351, a second-reading amendment to the city code that updates the municipal fee schedule. The council also approved Resolution 2025-55 to authorize summary publication of the ordinance.

The action came during the council's regular meeting after a brief presentation and roll-call vote. The ordinance was presented as a routine update to Chapter Two of the city code to adjust fees charged by the city; the meeting transcript did not enumerate the line-item changes discussed.

Council members moved and seconded the measure and approved it on a roll-call vote. The clerk recorded affirmative responses from the mayor and council members on the record.

City staff did not provide a detailed, line-by-line cost-impact estimate during the meeting; councilors directed staff to proceed with publication as permitted by state law. The council also approved a companion resolution to authorize a summary publication of Ordinance 351, a standard step after passage that permits a summary notice instead of printing the entire ordinance.

The ordinance takes the next administrative steps required for publication; no additional public hearing was recorded at this meeting on the fee schedule.

Council members did not specify an effective date for the fee adjustments during the discussion; staff follow-up was requested for implementation details.